Statuspage vs Uptime Kuma
Is it time to switch? We break down the differences so you can stop bleeding money.
Choose Uptime Kuma.
If you want to own your data, save money, and avoid vendor lock-in, Uptime Kuma is open source and community-driven.
What Actually Matters
No fluff — just the differences that affect your decision
Uptime Kuma is open source (MIT). Statuspage is closed. If vendor lock-in keeps you up at night, this is the deciding factor.
Uptime Kuma supports self-hosting via Docker. Statuspage is SaaS-only — convenient, but you're renting, not owning.
Uptime Kuma has the bigger crowd: 92.4k stars vs 0. More contributors, more integrations, more momentum.
Uptime Kuma is built in JavaScript — you can read the source, contribute, or fork it. Statuspage is closed-source, so you're trusting their engineering.
Try both — most offer free tiers. The right pick depends on your stack size, team, and tolerance for DevOps.
Statuspage
The best way to communicate status and downtime to your customers.
Why Choose Statuspage
- ✓Clean, professional status pages
- ✓Integrated incident management
- ✓Email/SMS subscriber notifications
Drawbacks
- ×Expensive for what it does ($29+/mo)
- ×Limited customization options
Uptime Kuma
A fancy self-hosted monitoring tool.
Why Choose Uptime Kuma
- ✓Beautiful, real-time monitoring dashboard
- ✓Multi-protocol support: HTTP, TCP, DNS, Docker, and more
- ✓Notification integrations with 90+ services including Slack, Discord, and Telegram
Drawbacks
- ×Self-hosted only (usually)
Related Comparisons
Explore alternatives for other tools in Monitoring
