gitea vs Peon
Is it time to switch? We break down the differences so you can stop bleeding money.
Choose gitea.
If you want to own your data, save money, and avoid vendor lock-in, gitea is more popular among developers.
What Actually Matters
No fluff — just the differences that affect your decision
Both are open source under MIT. No lock-in on either side — pick based on fit, not fear.
gitea lets you self-host with Docker — your data, your rules. Peon? Cloud only. If privacy matters, that's a dealbreaker.
gitea dominates with 58.5k GitHub stars vs 97. Bigger community = more plugins, more answers on Stack Overflow, faster bug fixes.
gitea is built in Go, Peon in TypeScript. Matters if you want to contribute, extend, or debug internals.
Try both — most offer free tiers. The right pick depends on your stack size, team, and tolerance for DevOps.
gitea
Self-hosted Git service with code review, team collaboration, package registry, and CI/CD, written in Go. Provides a lightweight, all-in-one software development platform.
Why Choose gitea
- ✓Built with Go — lightweight and highly performant
- ✓Single binary — easy to deploy and manage
- ✓Supports code review, team collaboration, and CI/CD — all-in-one platform
Drawbacks
- ×Self-hosting can be complex
- ×Smaller ecosystem compared to GitHub or GitLab
Peon
Open-source, self-hostable deployment platform. Deploy Git apps, Docker Compose, databases, and static sites to your own servers — an open alternative to Vercel/Heroku with project RBAC, audit logs, and MCP.
Why Choose Peon
- ✓Self-hosted Docker PaaS with first-class project RBAC and audit logs
- ✓Deploy Git apps, Compose stacks, databases, and static sites on your own servers
- ✓Built-in MCP server for AI-agent deploys without handing over root
Drawbacks
- ×Younger project with a smaller community than Coolify/Dokku
Related Comparisons
Explore alternatives for other tools in DevOps