filebrowser vs ONLYOFFICE
Is it time to switch? We break down the differences so you can stop bleeding money.
Choose filebrowser.
If you want to own your data, save money, and avoid vendor lock-in, filebrowser is more popular among developers.
What Actually Matters
No fluff โ just the differences that affect your decision
Both open source, different licenses: filebrowser uses Apache-2.0, ONLYOFFICE uses AGPL-3.0. Check the fine print if you're building commercial.
Both can run on your own metal with Docker. Full data ownership, no cloud dependency. We have deploy guides for each.
filebrowser dominates with 35.9k GitHub stars vs 7.0k. Bigger community = more plugins, more answers on Stack Overflow, faster bug fixes.
filebrowser is built in Go, ONLYOFFICE in Shell. Matters if you want to contribute, extend, or debug internals.
Try both โ most offer free tiers. The right pick depends on your stack size, team, and tolerance for DevOps.
filebrowser
Single-binary web file manager for uploading, deleting, previewing, and editing files within a specified directory. Built with Go.
Why Choose filebrowser
- โSingle binary โ easy to deploy and manage
- โBuilt with Go โ fast and lightweight architecture
- โCreate-your-own-cloud โ flexible and customizable
Drawbacks
- รSelf-hosting can be complex
- รLimited scalability for very large file sets
ONLYOFFICE
Powerful online document editors for text, spreadsheets, and presentations. Highly compatible with MS Office.
Why Choose ONLYOFFICE
- โFull-featured collaborative editing for docs, sheets, and slides
- โDrop-in MS Office compatibility with high-fidelity rendering
- โSelf-hosted integration with Nextcloud, Seafile, and more
Drawbacks
- รSelf-hosting can be complex
Related Comparisons
Explore alternatives for other tools in Productivity